方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 政策评估反事实影响评估 (CIE)× | 反事实影响评估 (CIE)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 因果推断 | 因果推断 |
| 方法族 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 起源年份≠ | 1974 (Rubin potential outcomes); 2010s (EU policy CIE formalisation) | 1970s–2000s |
| 提出者≠ | Rubin (potential outcomes framework); European Commission DG Research formalised policy CIE guidelines | Heckman, Imbens, Rubin, and the program evaluation literature |
| 类型≠ | Quasi-experimental causal evaluation | Causal inference / program evaluation |
| 开创性文献≠ | Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (2015). Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0521885881 | Heckman, J. J., & Vytlacil, E. J. (2007). Econometric evaluation of social programs, Part I: Causal models, structural models and econometric policy evaluation. Handbook of Econometrics, 6B, 4779-4874. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | CIE, policy CIE, counterfactual policy evaluation, impact evaluation | CIE, counterfactual evaluation, counterfactual policy evaluation, impact evaluation |
| 相关 | 5 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (CIE) for policy assessment estimates the causal effect of a public policy or programme by comparing observed outcomes of participants against a rigorously constructed counterfactual — what would have happened had the policy not existed. Rooted in the Rubin potential-outcomes framework, CIE is the standard methodology endorsed by the European Commission for evaluating research, innovation, and structural funding programmes. | Counterfactual Impact Evaluation is a family of causal methods that estimates the effect of an intervention by comparing what actually happened to participants with what would have happened had the intervention not taken place. Formalised in the Rubin Causal Model and extended by Heckman, Imbens and others, CIE underlies most modern program and policy evaluation practice. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|