ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

面板格兰杰因果检验×Toda-Yamamoto 因果检验×
领域计量经济学计量经济学
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份1988–20121995
提出者Holtz-Eakin, Newey & Rosen (1988); Dumitrescu & Hurlin (2012)Toda, H. Y. and Yamamoto, T.
类型Causality testCausality test
开创性文献Dumitrescu, E.-I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450–1460. DOI ↗Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66(1-2), 225-250. DOI ↗
别名panel causality test, Dumitrescu-Hurlin test, heterogeneous panel causality, panel Granger testToda-Yamamoto test, TY causality test, modified Wald test for Granger causality, TY-MWALD
相关55
摘要The Panel Granger Causality test examines whether past values of one variable help predict another variable across multiple cross-sectional units observed over time. It extends the classical Granger causality framework to panel data, accounting for cross-sectional heterogeneity and enabling more powerful inference by pooling information across units.The Toda-Yamamoto (TY) causality test is a modified Wald procedure for testing Granger causality in vector autoregressions (VARs) estimated in levels, even when variables are nonstationary or cointegrated. By intentionally over-fitting the VAR with extra lags equal to the maximum integration order, it restores the standard chi-squared asymptotic distribution of the Wald statistic without requiring prior unit-root or cointegration pretesting.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Panel Granger Causality · Toda-Yamamoto causality test. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare