方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 序数内容效度评估× | 探索性因子分析（EFA）× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 心理测量学 | 统计学 |
| 方法族 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 起源年份≠ | 2003 | — |
| 提出者≠ | Wynd, Schmidt & Schaefer | — |
| 类型≠ | Scale validation / content validity | Latent variable / dimension reduction |
| 开创性文献≠ | Wynd, C. A., Schmidt, B., & Schaefer, M. A. (2003). Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25(5), 508–518. DOI ↗ | Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C. & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | ordinal CVI, Likert-scale content validity, ordinal expert rating validity, graded content validity | common factor analysis, açımlayıcı faktör analizi, factor analysis |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Ordinal content validity replaces the traditional binary (yes/no) expert relevance judgment with a graded, Likert-type rating scale, allowing richer expert opinion to be captured when evaluating whether scale items adequately represent the intended construct domain. | Exploratory factor analysis reduces a large set of observed variables into a smaller number of latent common factors. It is widely used in scale development and psychometrics to uncover the dimensional structure that underlies a set of correlated items, without specifying that structure in advance. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|