方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 多层微分项目功能 (Multilevel DIF)× | 差异项目功能 (DIF)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 心理测量学 | 心理测量学 |
| 方法族 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 起源年份≠ | 2001 | 1970s–1993 |
| 提出者≠ | Kamata (2001) and subsequent multilevel IRT/DIF literature | William H. Angoff and colleagues (ETS); systematized by Holland & Wainer |
| 类型≠ | Bias detection / multilevel measurement model | Item-level bias detection |
| 开创性文献≠ | French, B. F., & Finch, W. H. (2008). Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis: Locating the invariant referent sets. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15(1), 96–113. DOI ↗ | Holland, P. W. & Wainer, H. (Eds.) (1993). Differential Item Functioning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 978-0805809589 |
| 别名 | multilevel DIF, hierarchical DIF analysis, cross-level DIF, ML-DIF | DIF, item bias analysis, measurement non-equivalence, item-level measurement bias |
| 相关 | 5 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Multilevel DIF analysis detects whether individual test or survey items function differently across groups when respondents are clustered within higher-level units — such as students nested in schools, employees in organizations, or patients in clinics. By accounting for hierarchical data structure, it separates genuine item bias from artificial DIF signals caused by ignoring clustering. | Differential item functioning identifies test or survey items that behave differently for examinees from different groups — such as gender, ethnicity, or language background — after controlling for the underlying ability or trait being measured. DIF analysis is essential for fairness evaluation in educational testing and psychological scale development. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|