ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

多组别项目功能差异 (MG-DIF)×多组验证性因子分析 (MG-CFA)×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份1980s-1990s1971
提出者Shealy & Stout (SIBTEST framework); Lord (IRT-based DIF)Karl Jöreskog
类型Measurement bias detectionMeasurement model / invariance test
开创性文献Millsap, R. E. (2012). Statistical Approaches to Measurement Invariance. Routledge. ISBN: 978-1848728936Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗
别名MG-DIF, multi-group DIF, differential item functioning across groups, multiple-group DIF analysisMG-CFA, multi-group CFA, measurement invariance testing, multi-sample CFA
相关66
摘要Multi-group differential item functioning examines whether test or scale items function equivalently across three or more distinct groups — such as gender, ethnicity, or country — after matching respondents on the underlying trait being measured. Items that behave differently across groups threaten fair measurement and valid score comparisons.Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis tests whether a measurement model holds equivalently across two or more groups — such as cultures, genders, or time points. By imposing increasingly stringent equality constraints and comparing model fit, it determines whether comparisons of latent mean scores are justified.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Multi-group Differential Item Functioning · Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare