ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

多组验证性因子分析 (MG-CFA)×结构方程模型×
领域心理测量学研究统计学
方法族Latent structureProcess / pipeline
起源年份19711921
提出者Karl JöreskogSewall Wright
类型Measurement model / invariance testMethod
开创性文献Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1973). LISREL: A general computer program for estimating a linear structural equation system. Research Bulletin 73-5. University of Stockholm. link ↗
别名MG-CFA, multi-group CFA, measurement invariance testing, multi-sample CFASEM, path analysis, latent variable modeling, causal modeling
相关63
摘要Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis tests whether a measurement model holds equivalently across two or more groups — such as cultures, genders, or time points. By imposing increasingly stringent equality constraints and comparing model fit, it determines whether comparisons of latent mean scores are justified.Structural equation modeling (SEM) is a comprehensive statistical framework combining path analysis (Sewall Wright, 1921) and confirmatory factor analysis to test complex causal models linking observed and latent variables. Formalized by Jöreskog (1973) with LISREL software, SEM enables simultaneous estimation of measurement relationships (how variables measure latent constructs) and structural relationships (how constructs influence outcomes), making it powerful for theory testing in psychology, epidemiology, organizational research, and health sciences where complex mediation, moderation, and latent processes require integrated analysis.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis · Structural Equation Modeling. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare