方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 多组验证性因子分析 (MG-CFA)× | 探索性因子分析（EFA）× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 心理测量学 | 统计学 |
| 方法族 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 起源年份≠ | 1971 | — |
| 提出者≠ | Karl Jöreskog | — |
| 类型≠ | Measurement model / invariance test | Latent variable / dimension reduction |
| 开创性文献≠ | Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗ | Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C. & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | MG-CFA, multi-group CFA, measurement invariance testing, multi-sample CFA | common factor analysis, açımlayıcı faktör analizi, factor analysis |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis tests whether a measurement model holds equivalently across two or more groups — such as cultures, genders, or time points. By imposing increasingly stringent equality constraints and comparing model fit, it determines whether comparisons of latent mean scores are justified. | Exploratory factor analysis reduces a large set of observed variables into a smaller number of latent common factors. It is widely used in scale development and psychometrics to uncover the dimensional structure that underlies a set of correlated items, without specifying that structure in advance. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|