ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

M/M/1队列:单服务器排队模型×M/M/c 队列:多服务器排队模型×
领域运筹学运筹学
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份19531998
提出者A. K. Erlang; David Kendall (notation)Queueing-theory tradition; Gross & Harris
类型Stochastic queueing modelMulti-server Markovian queueing model
开创性文献Kendall, D. G. (1953). Stochastic processes occurring in the theory of queues and their analysis by the method of the imbedded Markov chain. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 24(3), 338–354. DOI ↗Gross, D., & Harris, C. M. (1998). Fundamentals of Queueing Theory (3rd ed.). Wiley. ISBN: 978-0-471-17083-9
别名Single-Server Markovian Queue, Birth-Death Queue, Poisson Queue, M/M/1 Kuyruk ModeliMulti-Server Erlang Queue, c-Server Markovian Queue, Erlang-C Queue, Çok Sunuculu M/M/c Kuyruğu
相关33
摘要The M/M/1 queue is the foundational single-server queueing model in which customers arrive according to a Poisson process with rate λ, are served one at a time by a single server with exponentially distributed service times at rate μ, and wait in an infinite-capacity first-come-first-served queue. Formalized within the Kendall notation framework by David Kendall in 1953, building on A. K. Erlang's early twentieth-century telephone traffic work, it yields closed-form steady-state performance measures when the traffic intensity ρ = λ/μ is less than one.The M/M/c queue is a multi-server stochastic model in which customers arrive according to a Poisson process at rate λ, are served by c identical servers each with exponentially distributed service times at rate μ, and wait in a single common queue when all servers are busy. Systematized within classical queueing theory and thoroughly treated by Gross and Harris (1998), it extends the simpler M/M/1 model to settings with parallel servers, making it the foundational tool for capacity planning in service systems.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: M/M/1 Queue · M/M/c Queue. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare