ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

元分析 Kaplan-Meier 分析×Cox比例风险模型×
领域流行病学流行病学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份2007–2012 (systematic formalization)1972
提出者Building on Kaplan & Meier (1958); meta-analytic extension formalized by Tierney et al. (2007) and Guyot et al. (2012)Sir David Roxbee Cox
类型Quantitative meta-analytic methodSemi-parametric regression model
开创性文献Guyot, P., Ades, A. E., Ouwens, M. J., & Welton, N. J. (2012). Enhanced secondary analysis of survival data: reconstructing the data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12, 9. DOI ↗Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 34(2), 187–202. DOI ↗
别名KM meta-analysis, pooled Kaplan-Meier analysis, survival meta-analysis, IPD-KM meta-analysisCox regression, Cox PH model, proportional hazards model, CPH
相关45
摘要Meta-analytic Kaplan-Meier analysis synthesizes time-to-event data across multiple studies by pooling Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, either from reconstructed individual patient data or from summary statistics extracted from published curves. It produces a pooled survival function with confidence bands and enables formal heterogeneity testing across studies, offering higher statistical power and more generalizable survival estimates than any single study alone.The Cox proportional hazards model is a semi-parametric regression method that estimates the effect of one or more covariates on the hazard — the instantaneous rate of an event such as death, relapse, or failure — while making no assumption about the shape of the baseline hazard function. Introduced by David Cox in 1972, it is the dominant tool for multivariable survival analysis in clinical and epidemiological research.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Meta-analytic Kaplan-Meier analysis · Cox proportional hazards. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare