ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

深度访谈法×定性研究中的反思性×
领域质性研究质性研究
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19541990
提出者Carl Rogers and Herbert H. HymanAnthony Giddens and Pierre Bourdieu
类型MethodConcept
开创性文献Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0761908631Finlay, L. (2002). Outing the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531-545. DOI ↗
别名IDI, qualitative interview, one-on-one interview, in-depth interviewingreflexive practice, researcher reflexivity, positionality, reflective practice
相关54
摘要In-depth interviews are a qualitative research method in which a trained interviewer conducts one-on-one conversations with individual participants using open-ended questions to explore their experiences, perspectives, and understandings of a phenomenon. Developed in the 1950s by Rogers and Hyman, the method varies along a spectrum from structured (standardized question sets) to semi-structured (guided topic areas with flexibility) to unstructured (emergent, conversational). In-depth interviews are widely used in sociology, psychology, health sciences, anthropology, and organizational research to capture rich, detailed narratives and personal meaning.Reflexivity is the practice of examining how the researcher's identity, assumptions, relationships, and values influence the research process and findings. Rather than treating objectivity as achievable detachment, reflexivity acknowledges that the researcher is embedded within the research and cannot be fully separated from it. Originating in sociology and anthropology, reflexivity has become central to qualitative research rigor across disciplines. Reflexive researchers critically examine their own influence at each stage: research design, participant recruitment, data collection, interpretation, and presentation. This transparency strengthens rigor by making visible the lens through which data are collected and interpreted.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 4 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: In-Depth Interview Method · Reflexivity in Qualitative Research. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare