ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

伦理委员会申请流程×研究方案中的风险-效益评估×
领域研究伦理研究伦理
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19911979
提出者U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; International research oversight organizationsU.S. Department of Health and Human Services; International research ethics community
类型GuidelineFramework
开创性文献U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2018). Protection of Human Subjects. Code of Federal Regulations Title 45, Part 46, Section 46.109. link ↗The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. link ↗
别名IRB application, REC application, ethics approval, protocol submissionrisk-benefit analysis, risk-benefit calculation, risk-benefit justification, harm-benefit ratio
相关55
摘要Submitting a research protocol to an ethics committee (IRB, REC, or equivalent) is a mandatory procedural gateway in human subjects research. The application process requires researchers to document their study design, justify scientific rationale, disclose risks and benefits, provide participant protections (informed consent forms), and address ethical considerations. The submission includes a completed ethics application form, protocol document, consent forms, researcher CVs, and evidence of institutional support. This standardized process enables ethics committees to conduct rigorous, timely, and consistent review before research commences.A risk-benefit assessment is a systematic evaluation of the potential harms and benefits of a proposed research study, documented in ethics committee applications. The Belmont Report (1979) established the principle of beneficence—maximizing benefits while minimizing harm—as a cornerstone of research ethics. Regulatory frameworks (45 CFR 46.111 in the U.S., equivalent in other jurisdictions) require ethics committees to determine that risks are reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits before approving research. This assessment is not a simple calculation (risks + benefits) but a qualitative judgment incorporating probability, magnitude, and distribution of harms and benefits.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 4 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Ethics Committee Application Process · Risk-Benefit Assessment in Research Protocols. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare