ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

动态工具变量 (Dynamic Panel IV / Arellano-Bond)×因果推断的工具变量(IV)方法×
领域因果推断卫生经济学
方法族Regression modelProcess / pipeline
起源年份19911990s (modern applications)
提出者Arellano & Bond (1991); extended by Blundell & Bond (1998)Angrist & Pischke (applied econometrics); rooted in econometric theory
类型Dynamic panel causal estimationMethod
开创性文献Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297. DOI ↗Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press. link ↗
别名Dynamic IV, Dynamic Panel IV, Arellano-Bond GMM, System GMMIV, two-stage least squares, TSLS, causal estimation
相关53
摘要Dynamic Instrumental Variables estimation addresses endogeneity in panel models where the outcome depends on its own past values. By first-differencing to remove unit fixed effects and then using lagged levels as instruments for the differenced lagged outcome, it produces consistent causal estimates even when standard OLS or fixed-effects are biased by dynamic feedback.Instrumental variables (IV) is an econometric method to estimate causal effects when treatment or exposure is not randomly assigned and confounding is severe or unmeasured. IV relies on a third variable (instrument) that influences treatment but does not directly affect the outcome, allowing researchers to isolate the causal effect from the noise of confounding. Developed extensively in econometrics (Angrist & Pischke, 1990s–2000s), IV methods are increasingly used in health economics and health services research to leverage natural experiments and policy changes.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Dynamic Instrumental Variables · Instrumental Variables in Health Research. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare