方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 动态能力量表× | 吸收能力量表× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 战略管理 | 战略管理 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2007 | 2002 |
| 提出者≠ | David J. Teece | Shaker Zahra and Gerard George |
| 类型 | Organizational self-report questionnaire | Organizational self-report questionnaire |
| 开创性文献≠ | Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. DOI ↗ | Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | DCV, Teece Dynamic Capabilities | ACAP, Zahra-George Scale |
| 相关 | 5 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Dynamic Capabilities (DC) represent an organization's capacity to sense new opportunities and threats, seize those opportunities through strategic investments and organizational changes, and reconfigure assets and organizational structures to adapt to shifting competitive environments. Teece (2007) articulated this framework in the Strategic Management Journal, arguing that dynamic capabilities—not static resources—explain sustained competitive advantage in turbulent, knowledge-intensive markets. This scale operationalizes the three core processes underlying DC: sensing market and technology changes, making swift strategic decisions, and reorganizing the firm to exploit new opportunities. | Absorptive Capacity (ACAP) refers to an organization's ability to acquire, assimilate, transform, and exploit external knowledge to enhance innovation and performance. Zahra and George (2002) reconceptualized absorptive capacity into four distinct but interrelated processes in their foundational Academy of Management Review article. This measurement scale captures organizational learning dynamics and knowledge-based competitive advantage, making it essential for assessing innovation capability and knowledge management effectiveness. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|