ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于文档的课程分析×文献分析×
领域田野方法质性研究
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1950s–1980s (consolidated as a distinct approach)1920
提出者Rooted in curriculum theory (Tyler, 1949) and document analysis methodology (Bowen, 2009)Max Weber and Karl Mannheim
类型Qualitative/interpretive document-based researchMethod
开创性文献Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗Scott, J. (1990). A Matter of Record: Documentary Sources in Social Research. Polity Press. ISBN: 978-0745608419
别名curriculum document analysis, curricular document review, document analysis of curriculum, DCAdocumentary analysis, textual analysis, content analysis of documents, archival research
相关44
摘要Document-based curriculum analysis is a qualitative research method that systematically examines written curriculum artifacts — textbooks, syllabi, national standards, policy documents, scope-and-sequence guides, and lesson frameworks — to reveal intended learning goals, ideological assumptions, gaps, and alignment between policy and practice. It treats curriculum documents as primary data rather than supplementary material, applying structured content and interpretive analysis techniques to answer questions about what knowledge is valued, how it is sequenced, and whose perspectives are represented.Document analysis is a systematic qualitative research method for examining written, visual, or audiovisual sources—such as policy documents, historical records, organizational records, media reports, emails, social media posts, photographs, or videos—to extract meaning, identify patterns, and understand social phenomena. Developed by Weber and Mannheim in early 20th-century sociology, the method bridges historical research, content analysis, and textual interpretation. Document analysis is used across disciplines to understand organizational change, policy evolution, media representation, historical events, and cultural meaning. Documents provide evidence of what organizations, institutions, or societies value, decide, and communicate, often revealing contradictions between policy and practice.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Document-based Curriculum Analysis · Document Analysis. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare