方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 数字教育行动研究× | 教育行动研究× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 田野方法 | 田野方法 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1990s–2000s (digital integration of Lewinian action research traditions) | 1940s (Lewin); educational context developed 1970s–1980s |
| 提出者≠ | Rooted in Carr & Kemmis (1986); digital adaptation developed by Lankshear, Knobel, and others from mid-1990s onward | Kurt Lewin (action research foundations); Lawrence Stenhouse and John Elliott (educational adaptation) |
| 类型≠ | Applied qualitative-cyclical research design | Participatory qualitative research design |
| 开创性文献≠ | Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2004). A Handbook for Teacher Research: From Design to Implementation. Open University Press. ISBN: 978-0335211357 | Elliott, J. (1991). Action Research for Educational Change. Open University Press. ISBN: 978-0335096190 |
| 别名 | technology-integrated action research, online educational action research, digital-mediated practitioner inquiry, DEAR | EAR, practitioner research, teacher action research, classroom action research |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Digital educational action research is a cyclical, practitioner-led inquiry method in which educators systematically investigate a problem or question arising in digitally mediated teaching and learning environments. Drawing on the action research tradition of Carr, Kemmis, and Lewin, it integrates digital tools — learning management systems, social media, video, online collaborative platforms — both as the context of inquiry and as instruments for data collection, making it particularly suited to contemporary technology-rich classrooms. | Educational action research is a cyclical, practitioner-led inquiry method in which educators systematically investigate a problem or opportunity in their own classroom or school, implement a change, observe its effects, and reflect on findings to guide the next cycle. Rooted in Kurt Lewin's action research framework and developed for educational contexts by Lawrence Stenhouse and John Elliott, it bridges the gap between educational theory and classroom practice by making teachers agents of rigorous inquiry. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|