ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

恒定比较法×案例研究×内容分析×
领域质性质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19671984 (seminal codification)Systematised through Krippendorff's methodology work; 4th edition 2018
提出者Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. StraussRobert K. Yin (systematised in Case Study Research, 1984)Klaus Krippendorff (systematic formulation); roots in early 20th-century communications research
类型Qualitative research methodQualitative research designQualitative / mixed-method research technique
开创性文献Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. link ↗Yin, R.K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661
别名CCM, constant comparison, constant comparative analysis, comparative constant analysisVaka Çalışması (Case Study), case study design, case study methodologyİçerik Analizi, systematic content coding, quantitative content analysis
相关655
摘要The Constant Comparative Method (CCM) is a systematic qualitative analysis procedure in which every newly coded incident is immediately compared with all previously coded incidents in the same category. Introduced by Glaser and Strauss in their 1967 grounded theory framework, CCM drives theory development by cycling continuously between data collection and analysis, progressively refining categories until theoretical saturation is reached. Though closely associated with grounded theory, the method has been widely adopted as a stand-alone analytic strategy across qualitative traditions.Case study research is a qualitative research design that investigates a specific phenomenon, individual, group, organisation, or event in depth within its real-world context. Systematised by Robert K. Yin in 1984, it supports single-case and multiple-case designs and draws on multiple data sources — interviews, observation, documents, and artefacts — to build a rich, contextualised account of a bounded unit.Content analysis is a systematic research technique for reducing text, visual, or media material into coded categories so that patterns can be counted, compared, and interpreted. Formalised by Klaus Krippendorff in his widely cited methodology textbook (latest edition 2018), the method sits at the boundary of qualitative and quantitative inquiry: it imposes structured, replicable coding on inherently meaning-laden material.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Constant Comparative Method · Case Study · Content Analysis. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare