方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 恒定比较法× | 案例研究× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1967 | 1984 (seminal codification) |
| 提出者≠ | Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss | Robert K. Yin (systematised in Case Study Research, 1984) |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative research method | Qualitative research design |
| 开创性文献≠ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. link ↗ | Yin, R.K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| 别名≠ | CCM, constant comparison, constant comparative analysis, comparative constant analysis | Vaka Çalışması (Case Study), case study design, case study methodology |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | The Constant Comparative Method (CCM) is a systematic qualitative analysis procedure in which every newly coded incident is immediately compared with all previously coded incidents in the same category. Introduced by Glaser and Strauss in their 1967 grounded theory framework, CCM drives theory development by cycling continuously between data collection and analysis, progressively refining categories until theoretical saturation is reached. Though closely associated with grounded theory, the method has been widely adopted as a stand-alone analytic strategy across qualitative traditions. | Case study research is a qualitative research design that investigates a specific phenomenon, individual, group, organisation, or event in depth within its real-world context. Systematised by Robert K. Yin in 1984, it supports single-case and multiple-case designs and draws on multiple data sources — interviews, observation, documents, and artefacts — to build a rich, contextualised account of a bounded unit. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|