ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

恒定比较法×内容分析×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1967Systematised through Krippendorff's methodology work; 4th edition 2018
提出者Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. StraussKlaus Krippendorff (systematic formulation); roots in early 20th-century communications research
类型Qualitative research methodQualitative / mixed-method research technique
开创性文献Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. link ↗Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661
别名CCM, constant comparison, constant comparative analysis, comparative constant analysisİçerik Analizi, systematic content coding, quantitative content analysis
相关65
摘要The Constant Comparative Method (CCM) is a systematic qualitative analysis procedure in which every newly coded incident is immediately compared with all previously coded incidents in the same category. Introduced by Glaser and Strauss in their 1967 grounded theory framework, CCM drives theory development by cycling continuously between data collection and analysis, progressively refining categories until theoretical saturation is reached. Though closely associated with grounded theory, the method has been widely adopted as a stand-alone analytic strategy across qualitative traditions.Content analysis is a systematic research technique for reducing text, visual, or media material into coded categories so that patterns can be counted, compared, and interpreted. Formalised by Klaus Krippendorff in his widely cited methodology textbook (latest edition 2018), the method sits at the boundary of qualitative and quantitative inquiry: it imposes structured, replicable coding on inherently meaning-laden material.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Constant Comparative Method · Content Analysis. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare