ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

联合分析×2^(k-p) 分数析因设计×
领域实验设计实验设计
方法族Hypothesis testHypothesis test
起源年份19781961
提出者Paul E. Green & V. SrinivasanGeorge E. P. Box and J. Stuart Hunter
类型Decomposition-based utility estimationScreening and economical factorial design
开创性文献Green, P.E. & Srinivasan, V. (1978). Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(2), 103–123. DOI ↗Box, G.E.P. & Hunter, J.S. (1961). The 2^(k-p) Fractional Factorial Designs. Technometrics, 3(3), 311–351. link ↗
别名CBC conjoint, choice-based conjoint, adaptive conjoint analysis, full-profile conjoint2^k-p design, fractional factorial, screening design, Kesirli Faktöriyel Desen (2^k-p Fractional Factorial)
相关67
摘要Conjoint analysis is a preference-measurement technique that decomposes overall product evaluations into the separate utility values — called part-worths — that respondents assign to each attribute level. Formalised by Green and Srinivasan in their seminal 1978 Journal of Consumer Research paper, the method has become the dominant tool in marketing research and product design for quantifying what buyers truly trade off when they choose between options.The fractional factorial design is an economical experimental strategy that investigates k factors by running only a carefully chosen 1/2^p fraction of the full 2^k factorial experiment. Formalized by George E. P. Box and J. Stuart Hunter in their landmark 1961 Technometrics paper, it exploits the sparsity-of-effects principle — that high-order interactions are typically negligible — to screen many factors with far fewer runs than a complete factorial would require.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Conjoint Analysis · Fractional Factorial Design. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare