ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

计算机化自适应测验(CAT)中的区分效度×项目反应理论 (IRT)×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份1959 (discriminant validity); CAT application from 1990s onward1952–1968
提出者Campbell & Fiske (discriminant validity framework); applied to CAT by educational measurement researchersFrederic M. Lord (and Allan Birnbaum for the 2PL/3PL models)
类型Validity evaluation techniqueProbabilistic measurement model
开创性文献Weiss, D. J. (2004). Computerized adaptive testing for effective and efficient measurement in counseling and education. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 37(2), 70–84. DOI ↗Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Addison-Wesley. link ↗
别名CAT discriminant validity, adaptive test divergent validity, CAT scale differentiation, CAT construct separationIRT, latent trait theory, item characteristic curve theory, modern test theory
相关55
摘要Discriminant validity in computerized adaptive testing (CAT) is the evaluation process confirming that a CAT-administered scale measures its intended construct distinctly from related but conceptually different constructs. Despite the adaptive item-selection mechanism varying each respondent's item set, evidence must be provided that CAT-derived scores do not overlap excessively with scores from theoretically distinct scales.Item response theory models the probability that a respondent answers an item correctly (or endorses it) as a function of the respondent's latent trait level and the item's own statistical properties — difficulty, discrimination, and guessing. Unlike classical test theory, IRT places persons and items on the same scale, yielding measurement that is sample-independent for items and test-independent for persons.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Computerized adaptive test discriminant validity · Item Response Theory. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare