方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 临床教学质量量表 (CTQS)× | 专业身份量表 (PIS)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 健康教育 | 健康教育 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2001–2003 | 2006 |
| 提出者≠ | Kristina Ohrling & Ingela R. Hallberg | Adams et al. |
| 类型 | Self-report questionnaire | Self-report questionnaire |
| 开创性文献≠ | Ohrling, K. & Hallberg, I. R. (2001). The meaning of precepting: Nurse preceptors' lived experience of precept education. J Adv Nurs 33(1): 96–103. link ↗ | Adams, K., Hean, S., Sturgis, P., & Clark, J. M. (2006). Investigating the factors influencing professional identity of first-year health and social care students. Learn Health Soc Care 5(2): 55–68. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | Teaching Quality Assessment, Clinical Instructor Effectiveness Scale | Healthcare Professional Identity, Disciplinary Identity Assessment |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | The CTQS is a self-report questionnaire measuring students' perceptions of their clinical educator's (preceptor, clinical instructor, or mentor) teaching quality and effectiveness. Developed by Ohrling, Hallberg, and Gaberson in the early 2000s, the CTQS evaluates dimensions of clinical teaching including role modeling, knowledge transmission, feedback quality, student empowerment, and development of critical thinking. The scale is used in nursing and health professions education to provide educators with feedback on their teaching performance, identify professional development needs, and inform program quality assurance. | The PIS is a self-report questionnaire measuring healthcare students' sense of professional identity, belonging, and commitment to their chosen discipline. Developed by Adams and colleagues in 2006, the PIS assesses the degree to which students have internalized professional roles, values, behaviors, and career commitment. The scale measures both cognitive elements (knowledge of professional standards and scope of practice) and emotional elements (sense of belonging, pride in discipline). The PIS is used in healthcare education to track professional identity development over training, identify students at risk of attrition, and evaluate the impact of socialization experiences on disciplinary commitment. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|