ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

方差因果关系检验×GARCH-MIDAS×
领域计量经济学计量经济学
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份19962012
提出者Yin-Wong Cheung and Lilian NgEngle and Ghysels
类型Conditional variance testTime-varying variance model
开创性文献Cheung, Y. W., & Ng, L. K. (1996). A causality-in-variance test and its application to financial market prices. Journal of Econometrics, 72(1-2), 33-61. DOI ↗Engle, R. F., & Ghysels, E. (2012). GARCH for long memory. Journal of Econometrics, 164(2), 385-391. link ↗
别名Volatility spillover testMixed-frequency volatility model
相关33
摘要The causality-in-variance test detects whether shocks to one variable cause changes in the conditional variance (volatility) of another variable, distinct from mean-level causality. Introduced by Cheung and Ng (1996), it identifies volatility spillovers and contagion effects—crucial for risk management and understanding financial market interdependencies. This approach has become standard in studying shock transmission across asset classes and geographies.GARCH-MIDAS decomposes volatility into short-term (GARCH) and long-term (MIDAS) components, allowing low-frequency macroeconomic variables to drive medium-term volatility while high-frequency returns govern daily fluctuations. Introduced by Engle and Ghysels (2012), this framework elegantly separates volatility time scales. The approach is powerful for understanding how macro conditions (growth, inflation) drive risk premia and for improved volatility forecasting.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Causality in Variance Test · GARCH-MIDAS. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare