方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 贝叶斯II期临床试验× | 贝叶斯Ⅰ期临床试验× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 流行病学 | 流行病学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1990s (Thall & Simon 1994; Berry 1985–2006) | 1990 |
| 提出者≠ | Peter Thall, Richard Simon, Donald Berry (key contributors) | O'Quigley, Pepe & Fisher (Continual Reassessment Method) |
| 类型≠ | Interventional clinical trial design | Adaptive Bayesian dose-finding design |
| 开创性文献≠ | Thall, P. F., & Simon, R. (1994). Practical Bayesian guidelines for phase IIB clinical trials. Biometrics, 50(2), 337–349. DOI ↗ | O'Quigley, J., Pepe, M., & Fisher, L. (1990). Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer. Biometrics, 46(1), 33–48. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | Bayesian phase 2 trial, Bayesian single-arm phase II study, Bayesian early-phase efficacy trial, Bayes phase II | Bayesian dose-finding trial, CRM trial, continual reassessment method trial, Bayesian dose-escalation study |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | A Bayesian Phase II clinical trial applies Bayesian statistical inference to the standard Phase II objective of evaluating whether an experimental treatment shows sufficient early-phase efficacy to justify progression to a Phase III trial. By combining prior information with accumulating trial data, it enables principled interim monitoring, flexible stopping rules, and updated probability statements about treatment effect — all without the multiple-testing penalties that burden frequentist sequential designs. | A Bayesian Phase I clinical trial uses prior probability models and sequential Bayes updating to find the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a new agent. Unlike the traditional 3+3 rule-based escalation, the Bayesian approach revises a dose-toxicity curve continuously as each patient's outcome is observed, allowing faster convergence to the true MTD while minimising exposure of patients to unsafe or subtherapeutic doses. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|