方法对比

	加法比率评估	复杂比例评估	衡量备选方案并根据折衷解进行排序
领域	决策	决策	决策
方法族	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
起源年份	2010	1996	2020
提出者	Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.	Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.	Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Puška, A., Chatterjee, P.
类型	Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row)	Proportional assessment (benefit/cost split)	Utility function (ideal + anti-ideal reference)
开创性文献	Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy	Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65	Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Puška, A., Chatterjee, P. (2020). Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to Compromise Solution (MARCOS). Computers & Industrial Engineering
别名	—	—	—
相关	8	8	8
摘要	ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	MARCOS (Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to Compromise Solution) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Puška, A., Chatterjee, P. in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.