方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 加法比率评估× | 衡量备选方案并根据折衷解进行排序× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 决策 | 决策 |
| 方法族 | MCDM | MCDM |
| 起源年份≠ | 2010 | 2020 |
| 提出者≠ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. | Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Puška, A., Chatterjee, P. |
| 类型≠ | Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row) | Utility function (ideal + anti-ideal reference) |
| 开创性文献≠ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗ | Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Puška, A., Chatterjee, P. (2020). Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to Compromise Solution (MARCOS). Computers & Industrial Engineering DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | — | — |
| 相关 | 8 | 8 |
| 摘要≠ | ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | MARCOS (Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to Compromise Solution) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Puška, A., Chatterjee, P. in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|