ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

学术诚信量表×学术求助量表×
领域教育心理学教育心理学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份2000s1990s-2000s
提出者Various authors; instrument varies by versionKarabenick, S.A.; colleagues
类型Self-report questionnaireSelf-report questionnaire
开创性文献Cizek, G. J. (2003). Detecting and preventing classroom cheating: Practical strategies for teachers and professors. Corwin Press. link ↗Karabenick, S. A., & Knapp, J. R. (2005). Help seeking in learning. In C. E. Spielberger (Ed.), Encyclopedia of applied psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 149–160). Academic Press. link ↗
别名AISAHSS
相关55
摘要The Academic Integrity Scale measures students' attitudes, values, and likelihood of engaging in academic dishonesty including cheating, plagiarism, and unauthorized collaboration. Multiple validated versions exist, each assessing different facets of academic integrity such as personal integrity commitment, perceived cheating prevalence, institutional support for honesty, and personal susceptibility to cheating. This instrument is essential for understanding integrity culture in educational settings and evaluating interventions promoting academic honesty.The Academic Help-Seeking Scale measures students' inclination to seek academic help, their preferred sources of assistance (instructors, peers, tutors), and barriers that inhibit help-seeking (fear of judgment, embarrassment, preference for independence). Developed by Karabenick and colleagues in the 1990s, the AHSS recognizes that seeking help when confused or struggling is not a sign of weakness but a critical academic skill that separates successful from struggling students. By identifying whether students avoid help due to shame, lack of awareness, or other barriers, this scale enables targeted interventions promoting adaptive help-seeking.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Academic Integrity Scale · Academic Help-Seeking Scale. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare