ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Phân tích Rủi ro Cạnh tranh Thích ứng×Thiết kế thử nghiệm thích ứng×Phân tích sống còn×
Lĩnh vựcDịch tễ họcNghiên cứu lâm sàngThống kê nghiên cứu
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời1999 (foundational Fine-Gray model); adaptive extensions 2000s–2010s1990s-2000s1958
Người khởi xướngFine & Gray (subdistribution hazard, 1999); adaptive extensions by Beyersmann, Schumacher and colleaguesStephen Pocock, Christopher Jennison, and statistical methodologists; FDA formalized guidance 2019Edward L. Kaplan and Paul Meier
LoạiStatistical survival analysis with adaptive interim monitoringResearch DesignMethod
Công trình gốcFine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999). A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 496–509. DOI ↗Pocock, S. J. (2005). Current issues in the design and interpretation of clinical trials. BMJ, 330(7500), 1118–1121. link ↗Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53(282), 457–481. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácadaptive Fine-Gray analysis, group-sequential competing risks, adaptive subdistribution hazard analysis, competing risks adaptive designadaptive trial, adaptive design, response-adaptive randomization, RARKaplan-Meier analysis, Cox regression, TTE analysis
Liên quan213
Tóm tắtAdaptive competing risks analysis combines the Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard framework — which models the cumulative incidence of one cause of failure in the presence of other mutually exclusive causes — with adaptive or group-sequential interim monitoring rules. This allows a clinical trial or observational study to be modified mid-course (e.g., sample size reassessment, early stopping) based on accumulating competing-risk data while maintaining pre-specified type I error control.An adaptive trial design allows pre-specified modifications to the trial based on interim data—such as sample size re-estimation, stopping for futility or efficacy, dropping ineffective arms, or shifting randomization ratios toward better-performing treatments. Developed systematically in the 1990s–2000s by statisticians like Pocock and Jennison, and formalized by the FDA in 2019, adaptive designs accelerate drug development, reduce exposure to ineffective treatments, and improve efficiency without inflating false-positive rates when properly executed.Survival analysis is a collection of statistical methods for modeling time from a defined starting point until an event of interest occurs (disease, recovery, death, equipment failure). Kaplan and Meier's nonparametric estimator (1958) and David Cox's proportional hazards model (1972) jointly enabled analysis of censored data—individuals whose event times are unknown because they left the study or were still event-free at follow-up. Indispensable in oncology, cardiology, infectious disease research, engineering reliability, and any field where time-to-event matters.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Adaptive Competing Risks Analysis · Adaptive Trial Design · Survival Analysis. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-18 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare