ScholarGate
Асистент

Порівняння методів

Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.

Lee-Strazicich Test×Критерій одиничного кореня Ламсдейна-Папелла з двома структурними розривами×Тест Живота-Ендрюса на одиничний корінь з одним структурним розривом×
ГалузьЕконометрикаЕконометрикаЕконометрика
РодинаHypothesis testHypothesis testHypothesis test
Рік появи200319971992
Автор методуJunsoo Lee & Mark StrazicichRobin Lumsdaine & David PapellEric Zivot & Donald Andrews
ТипLagrange Multiplier unit-root test with two endogenous structural breaksSequential two-break unit-root testSequential unit-root test with endogenous break-point selection
Основоположне джерелоLee, J., & Strazicich, M. C. (2003). Minimum Lagrange multiplier unit root test with two structural breaks. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 1082–1089. DOI ↗Lumsdaine, R. L., & Papell, D. H. (1997). Multiple trend breaks and the unit-root hypothesis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(2), 212–218. DOI ↗Zivot, E., & Andrews, D. W. K. (1992). Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251–270. DOI ↗
Інші назвиLS Unit Root Test, Minimum LM Unit Root Test, Lee-Strazicich Two-Break Test, Lee-Strazicich LM TestiLP Test, Two-Break Unit-Root Test, Double Structural Break Unit-Root Test, Lumsdaine-Papell İki Kırılmalı Birim Kök TestiZA Test, Zivot-Andrews Break Test, Endogenous Break Unit-Root Test, Zivot-Andrews Birim Kök Testi
Пов'язані333
ПідсумокThe Lee-Strazicich (2003) test is a Lagrange Multiplier-based unit-root test that allows for two endogenous structural breaks under both the null and alternative hypotheses. Proposed by Junsoo Lee and Mark C. Strazicich, it corrects a fundamental flaw in earlier break-based tests such as Zivot-Andrews, where structural breaks were permitted only under the alternative. By incorporating breaks under the null, the LS test avoids spurious rejections and provides size-correct inference in the presence of level or trend shifts.The Lumsdaine-Papell test, introduced by Robin Lumsdaine and David Papell in 1997, extends the Zivot-Andrews single-break unit-root test to allow for two simultaneous structural breaks in the intercept and/or linear trend of a time series. It is widely used in macroeconomics and finance when data are suspected to have experienced two major regime shifts — such as policy changes, financial crises, or wars — and the researcher needs to determine whether the series is nonetheless integrated of order one.The Zivot-Andrews (ZA) test, introduced by Eric Zivot and Donald Andrews in 1992, is a sequential unit-root test that allows for a single structural break at an unknown date. It extends the augmented Dickey-Fuller framework by endogenously selecting the break point that provides the strongest evidence against the unit-root null hypothesis, making it particularly useful for macroeconomic and financial time series that may have been disrupted by events such as policy changes, financial crises, or supply shocks.
ScholarGateНабір даних
  1. v1
  2. 1 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти до пошуку Завантажити слайди

ScholarGateПорівняння методів: Lee-Strazicich Test · Lumsdaine-Papell Test · Zivot-Andrews Test. Отримано 2026-06-20 з https://scholargate.app/uk/compare