Contribution Analysis
Contribution analysis is a theory-based evaluation approach that addresses the attribution problem — establishing whether and how an intervention made a difference — without relying on an experimental counterfactual. Developed by John Mayne from 2001 onward, it works by articulating the program's theory of change, gathering evidence along that chain, and then assembling a 'contribution story' that is progressively stress-tested against rival explanations. The aim is not statistical attribution but a credible, evidence-based conclusion that the program plausibly contributed to observed results, in the face of other influencing factors.
Tam yöntemi oku
Bu bölümü okumak için ücretsiz hesapla giriş yapın.
Yöntem haritası
İlişkili yöntemlerin komşuluğu — keşfetmek için bir düğüm seçin.
Kaynaklar
- Mayne, J. (2012). Contribution analysis: Coming of age? Evaluation, 18(3), 270–280. DOI: 10.1177/1356389012451663 ↗
- Mayne, J. (2001). Addressing attribution through contribution analysis: Using performance measures sensibly. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 16(1), 1–24. DOI: 10.3138/cjpe.016.001 ↗
Bu sayfayı kaynak gösterin
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Contribution Analysis for Causal Inference in Program Evaluation. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/tr/public-policy/contribution-analysis
Hangi yöntem?
Bu yöntemi en yakın akrabalarının yanına koyup yan yana okuyun — kütüphane kitapları masaya serer; seçim sizindir.
- Process EvaluationPublic Policy↔ karşılaştır
- Realist EvaluationPublic Policy↔ karşılaştır
- Theory of Change EvaluationPublic Policy↔ karşılaştır