เปรียบเทียบวิธี

	SAPROF: การประเมินปัจจัยคุ้มครองสำหรับความเสี่ยงในการก่อความรุนแรงแบบมีโครงสร้าง	SPJ Framework
สาขาวิชา	จิตวิทยานิติเวช	จิตวิทยานิติเวช
ตระกูล	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
ปีกำเนิด	2012	2003
ผู้ริเริ่ม	Vivienne de Vogel, Corine de Ruiter, Yvonne Bouman, Merike de Vries Robbé	Stephen D. Hart, Peter R. Kropp, David R. Laws
ประเภท	Clinician-rated	Clinician-Synthesized
แหล่งต้นตำรับ	de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2012). SAPROF: Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (Version 3). Forum Educatief.	Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., & Laws, D. R. (Eds.). (2003). Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment, and treatment. Guilford Press.
ชื่อเรียกอื่น	SAPROF, de Vogel SAPROF	SPJ, Structured Professional Judgment, SPJ Framework
ที่เกี่ยวข้อง	4	4
สรุป	The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk (SAPROF) is a 17-item structured professional judgment tool developed by de Vogel, de Ruiter, Bouman, and colleagues (2012) to identify protective factors and strengths in individuals undergoing violence risk assessment. It complements risk assessment instruments (e.g., HCR-20v3) by systematically evaluating resilience, social support, motivation, and positive functioning—domains that mitigate violence risk and inform rehabilitation potential.	The Structured Professional Judgment (SPJ) framework represents a contemporary approach to forensic risk assessment that synthesizes clinical judgment with empirical evidence of risk factors. Rather than producing a numerical score, SPJ guides clinicians through systematic evaluation of case-specific evidence to arrive at a structured, transparent categorical risk judgment. SPJ has become the preferred methodology in many forensic settings globally and underlies instruments such as the HCR-20v3 (violence risk) and sexual offender assessment protocols.