ScholarGate
ผู้ช่วย

เปรียบเทียบวิธี

ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้

Responsible Research and Innovation Assessment×Constructive Technology Assessment×
สาขาวิชาScience Technology StudiesScience Technology Studies
ตระกูลProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
ปีกำเนิด20131995
ผู้ริเริ่มJack Stilgoe, Richard Owen, Phil MacnaghtenArie Rip & Johan Schot (Dutch CTA tradition)
ประเภทNormative governance and reflexive-assessment processCo-evolutionary technology-shaping process
แหล่งต้นตำรับStilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568-1580. DOI ↗Schot, J., & Rip, A. (1997). The past and future of constructive technology assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 54(2-3), 251-268. DOI ↗
ชื่อเรียกอื่นRRI assessment, Responsible innovation framework, AIRR assessmentCTA, Constructive TA, Co-evolutionary technology assessment
ที่เกี่ยวข้อง44
สรุปResponsible Research and Innovation (RRI) assessment is an approach to governing science and innovation that asks not only whether a technology works but whether it is desirable, and seeks to align research and innovation with the values, needs, and expectations of society. The influential Stilgoe-Owen-Macnaghten framework operationalises this through four dimensions—anticipation, reflexivity, inclusion, and responsiveness (AIRR)—that are built into the innovation process so that direction and purpose, not just risk and product, become objects of deliberate care.Constructive Technology Assessment (CTA) is an approach to assessing technology that seeks to influence its design and development, not merely to forecast its impacts after the fact. By broadening the design process to feed societal aspects back to engineers and decision-makers early—while the technology is still malleable—CTA aims to manage the co-evolution of technology and society and to soften the Collingridge dilemma, the bind in which a technology's effects are easy to change before they are known and hard to change once they are.
ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล
  1. v1
  2. 2 แหล่งอ้างอิง
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 แหล่งอ้างอิง
  3. PUBLISHED

ไปที่หน้าค้นหา ดาวน์โหลดสไลด์

ScholarGateเปรียบเทียบวิธี: Responsible Research and Innovation Assessment · Constructive Technology Assessment. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2026-06-24 จาก https://scholargate.app/th/compare