เปรียบเทียบวิธี
ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้
| การประเมินผลกระทบเชิงโต้กลับแบบหลายช่วงเวลา× | Difference-in-Differences (DiD)× | |
|---|---|---|
| สาขาวิชา≠ | การอนุมานเชิงสาเหตุ | เศรษฐมิติ |
| ตระกูล | Regression model | Regression model |
| ปีกำเนิด≠ | 2000s–2010s | 1994 |
| ผู้ริเริ่ม≠ | Developed through EU policy evaluation practice (European Commission); formalized by Lechner, Caliendo, and related econometricians | Card & Krueger (canonical 1994 application); Angrist & Pischke (textbook treatment) |
| ประเภท≠ | Causal inference / quasi-experimental evaluation | Causal inference / panel regression |
| แหล่งต้นตำรับ≠ | Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 31-72. DOI ↗ | Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton University Press. ISBN: 978-0691120355 |
| ชื่อเรียกอื่น≠ | multi-period CIE, longitudinal counterfactual evaluation, dynamic counterfactual impact evaluation, multi-wave CIE | diff-in-diff, DiD, Farkların Farkı (Diff-in-Diff) |
| ที่เกี่ยวข้อง≠ | 4 | 5 |
| สรุป≠ | Multi-period Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (CIE) estimates the causal effect of a policy or program by constructing what would have happened to treated units across multiple time periods had they not been treated. Unlike single-period evaluations, it tracks treatment effects as they evolve over time, capturing dynamic, delayed, or fading impacts that a two-period comparison would miss. | Difference-in-Differences is a causal-inference method that estimates the effect of an intervention by comparing how a treatment group and a control group change over time. Made famous by Card and Krueger's 1994 minimum-wage study and developed in Angrist and Pischke's Mostly Harmless Econometrics, it isolates the treatment effect as the difference between the two groups' before-after changes. |
| ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล ↗ |
|
|