เปรียบเทียบวิธี
ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้
| การศึกษาตนเองเชิงตีความ× | ปรัชญาปรากฏการณ์วิทยาเชิงตีความ× | |
|---|---|---|
| สาขาวิชา | เชิงคุณภาพ | เชิงคุณภาพ |
| ตระกูล | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| ปีกำเนิด≠ | 1990s–2000s | 1927 (Heidegger); systematised for human sciences by van Manen in 1990 |
| ผู้ริเริ่ม≠ | Carolyn Ellis, Arthur Bochner (evocative strand); Leon Anderson (analytic/interpretive strand) | Martin Heidegger (philosophical foundation); Max van Manen (methodological systematisation) |
| ประเภท≠ | Qualitative self-study design | Qualitative interpretive research design |
| แหล่งต้นตำรับ≠ | Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1), Art. 10. link ↗ | van Manen, M. (1990). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. State University of New York Press. ISBN: 978-0791404645 |
| ชื่อเรียกอื่น | interpretive autoethnography, evocative autoethnography, analytic autoethnography, IAE | hermeneutic phenomenology, van Manen phenomenology, Heideggerian phenomenology, interpretive phenomenological inquiry |
| ที่เกี่ยวข้อง≠ | 6 | 5 |
| สรุป≠ | Interpretive autoethnography is a qualitative research design in which the researcher uses systematic analysis of their own lived experience as the primary data source, moving beyond evocative personal narrative to connect personal meaning with broader cultural, social, or theoretical frameworks. Drawing on Leon Anderson's analytic strand and building on Ellis and Bochner's foundational work, it treats the researcher's self-account as both evidence and interpretive lens, subjecting personal stories to disciplined ethnographic and theoretical scrutiny to generate insights that extend beyond the individual case. | Interpretive phenomenology is a qualitative research design that investigates the meaning people attribute to their lived experiences by combining phenomenological description with hermeneutic interpretation. Rooted in Heidegger's ontology and systematised for social and human sciences by Max van Manen, it moves beyond description to ask what an experience means within a person's broader lifeworld, cultural context, and situated understanding. The researcher's own interpretive horizon is treated as an analytical resource rather than a bias to eliminate. |
| ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล ↗ |
|
|