ScholarGate
Asistent

Uporedite metode

Pregledajte izabrane metode jednu pored druge; redovi koji se razlikuju su istaknuti.

Metoda sintetičke kontrole za evaluaciju politike×Uskladiivanje rezultata sklonosti×
OblastKauzalno zaključivanjeIstraživačka statistika
PorodicaRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Godina nastanka2003-20101983
TvoracAlberto Abadie & Javier Gardeazabal; extended by Abadie, Diamond & HainmuellerPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
TipCausal inference / comparative case studyMethod
Temeljni izvorAbadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2010). Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California's Tobacco Control Program. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(490), 493-505. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Drugi naziviSynthetic Control Method, SCM, Synthetic Control, Abadie-Diamond-Hainmueller methodPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Srodne53
SažetakThe Synthetic Control Method (SCM) is a causal inference technique for evaluating the effect of a policy or intervention on a single treated unit — such as a region, country, or firm — by constructing a weighted combination of untreated comparison units that closely mirrors the treated unit before the intervention. Introduced by Abadie and Gardeazabal (2003) and formalized by Abadie, Diamond, and Hainmueller (2010), it provides a data-driven, transparent counterfactual for comparative case studies.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateSkup podataka
  1. v1
  2. 2 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED

Idi na pretragu Preuzmi slajdove

ScholarGateUporedite metode: Policy Evaluation Synthetic Control Method · Propensity Score Matching. Preuzeto 2026-06-18 sa https://scholargate.app/sr/compare