Uporedite metode
Pregledajte izabrane metode jednu pored druge; redovi koji se razlikuju su istaknuti.
| Analiza centralnosti× | Модел експоненцијалних случајних графова (ЕРГМ / п*)× | Predviđanje veza× | Mrežni difuzioni modeli× | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oblast | Analiza mreža | Analiza mreža | Analiza mreža | Analiza mreža |
| Porodica | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Godina nastanka≠ | 1979 | 1986 (foundational); modern ERGM framework 1996–2007 | 2003 | 1927 (epidemiological compartmental); 2003 (social influence cascade) |
| Tvorac≠ | Linton C. Freeman | Frank & Strauss (1986); extended by Wasserman & Pattison (1996) and Robins et al. (2007) | — | Kermack & McKendrick (SIR/SIS, 1927); Kempe, Kleinberg & Tardos (Independent Cascade, 2003) |
| Tip≠ | Descriptive / exploratory network measure family | Probabilistic generative network model | Network inference task | Stochastic / deterministic simulation on graphs |
| Temeljni izvor≠ | Freeman, L.C. (1979). Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215-239. DOI ↗ | Robins, G., Pattison, P., Kalish, Y., & Lusher, D. (2007). An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks, 29(2), 173-191. DOI ↗ | Liben-Nowell, D. & Kleinberg, J. (2007). The Link-Prediction Problem for Social Networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(7), 1019-1031. DOI ↗ | Kermack, W.O. & McKendrick, A.G. (1927). A Contribution to the Mathematical Theory of Epidemics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, 115(772), 700-721. DOI ↗ |
| Drugi nazivi | Merkeziyet Analizi (Degree, Betweenness, Eigenvector), node centrality, centrality measures, graph centrality | ERGM, p-star model, p* model, Üstel Rastgele Graf Modeli (ERGM / p*) | Bağlantı Tahmini (Link Prediction), missing link prediction, future link prediction, edge prediction | epidemic spreading models, compartmental models, influence propagation models, Ağ Yayılım Modelleri (SIR, SIS, Independent Cascade) |
| Srodne≠ | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Sažetak≠ | Centrality analysis is a family of network-analytic measures, formalized by Freeman (1979), that quantifies the structural importance of individual nodes within a graph. Each centrality index captures a distinct mechanism of influence: degree centrality reflects direct connectivity, betweenness centrality identifies nodes that broker information flow, closeness centrality captures proximity to all others, and eigenvector centrality (along with PageRank) rewards connection to highly connected neighbors. | The Exponential Random Graph Model (ERGM), also known as the p* model, is a statistical framework for network analysis that models the probability of an observed network as a function of its local structural features — such as reciprocity, triangles, and degree distribution. Developed from the foundational work of Frank and Strauss (1986) and extended into the modern framework by Wasserman and Pattison (1996) and Robins et al. (2007), ERGM is the inferential standard for social network analysis, capable of testing whether observed network structures arise by chance or reflect genuine social processes. | Link prediction is a network-analysis task that estimates which edges are missing from an observed graph or which edges are likely to form in the future. Formalised by Liben-Nowell and Kleinberg (2003, 2007), it covers a spectrum of approaches — from simple structural similarity indices such as Common Neighbors, Jaccard coefficient, and Adamic-Adar, to matrix factorisation, and graph neural network (GNN) methods — and is evaluated with AUC and Average Precision to account for the heavily imbalanced ratio of real to non-existing edges. | Network diffusion models are a family of compartmental and probabilistic frameworks that simulate how information, disease, or innovation spreads across a connected system. Rooted in the mathematical epidemiology of Kermack and McKendrick (1927), the SIR and SIS models partition nodes into states and track transitions driven by contact rates and recovery probabilities. The Independent Cascade and Linear Threshold models, formalised by Kempe, Kleinberg, and Tardos (2003), extend this logic to social influence, modelling how activation propagates through a network one neighbour at a time. |
| ScholarGateSkup podataka ↗ |
|
|
|
|