ScholarGate
Assistente
Process / pipelineSociology of scientific knowledge

Boundary-Work Analysis

Boundary-work analysis studies how the line between science and non-science is drawn, defended, and contested—not by philosophers laying down timeless criteria, but by actors doing rhetorical work to secure authority, resources, and credibility. Introduced by Thomas Gieryn in 1983 and elaborated in his 1999 book Cultural Boundaries of Science, the approach treats demarcation as a practical, strategic, and historically variable accomplishment. The method examines the discourse of demarcation episodes to reveal the strategies—expansion, expulsion, and protection of autonomy—through which the cultural map of science is redrawn whenever its credibility is on the line.

Abrir no MethodMindEm breveAplicar, comparar, obter orientação
Ferramentas e recursos
Baixar slides
Aprender e explorar
VídeoEm breve

Leia o método completo

Exclusivo para membros

Entre com uma conta gratuita para ler esta seção.

Entrar

Mapa de métodos

A vizinhança de métodos relacionados — selecione um nó para explorar.

Fontes

  1. Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781-795. DOI: 10.2307/2095325
  2. Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 9780226292625

Como citar esta página

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Boundary-Work Analysis (Demarcation of Science). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/pt/science-technology-studies/boundary-work-analysis

Qual método?

Coloque este método ao lado dos seus pares mais próximos e leia-os lado a lado — a biblioteca dispõe os livros sobre a mesa; a escolha é sua.

Comparar lado a lado

Referenciado por

ScholarGateBoundary-Work Analysis (Boundary-Work Analysis (Demarcation of Science)). Recuperado em 2026-06-24 de https://scholargate.app/pt/science-technology-studies/boundary-work-analysis · Conjunto de dados: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026