ScholarGate
Assistente
Process / pipelineIdeology & legitimation

System Justification Scale

The System Justification Scale operationalizes system justification theory, introduced by Jost and Banaji (1994), which holds that people are motivated to defend, bolster, and rationalize the existing social, economic, and political status quo, even when doing so runs against their personal or group interest. The general version, refined by Kay and Jost (2003), is an 8-item self-report measure on which respondents rate agreement with statements such as 'In general, the American political system operates as it should' on a 7- or 9-point Likert scale.

Abrir no MethodMindEm breveAplicar, comparar, obter orientação
Ferramentas e recursos
Baixar slides
Aprender e explorar
VídeoEm breve

Leia o método completo

Exclusivo para membros

Entre com uma conta gratuita para ler esta seção.

Entrar

Mapa de métodos

A vizinhança de métodos relacionados — selecione um nó para explorar.

Fontes

  1. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1-27. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
  2. Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of poor but happy and poor but honest stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 823-837. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823

Como citar esta página

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). System Justification Scale. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/pt/political-psychology/system-justification-scale

Qual método?

Coloque este método ao lado dos seus pares mais próximos e leia-os lado a lado — a biblioteca dispõe os livros sobre a mesa; a escolha é sua.

Comparar lado a lado

Referenciado por

ScholarGateSystem Justification Scale (System Justification Scale). Recuperado em 2026-06-24 de https://scholargate.app/pt/political-psychology/system-justification-scale · Conjunto de dados: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026