Comparar métodos

	SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations)	Árvore de Decisão	Regressão Logística
Área	Aprendizado de máquina	Aprendizado de máquina	Estatística para pesquisa
Família	Machine learning	Machine learning	Process / pipeline
Ano de origem	2017	1984	1958
Autor original	Lundberg, S.M. & Lee, S.-I.	Breiman, Friedman, Olshen & Stone	David Roxbee Cox
Tipo	Model-explanation method (Shapley-value attribution)	Recursive partitioning (if-then rules)	Method
Fonte seminal	Lundberg, S.M. & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 4766–4777.	Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.A. & Stone, C.J. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth.	Cox, D. R. (1958). The regression analysis of binary sequences. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 20(2), 215–242.
Outros nomes	SHAP Değerleri (Model Açıklanabilirlik), Shapley additive explanations, SHAP values, model explainability	Karar Ağacı (Decision Tree), karar ağacı, classification tree, regression tree	logit model, binomial logistic regression, LR
Relacionados	5	5	3
Resumo	SHAP is a model-explanation method, introduced by Scott Lundberg and Su-In Lee in 2017, that uses Shapley values from cooperative game theory to measure how much each feature contributes to an individual prediction, making the output of black-box machine-learning models interpretable. It supports both global explanations (overall feature importance) and local explanations (why one specific prediction came out the way it did).	A Decision Tree is an interpretable classification and regression method, formalised by Breiman, Friedman, Olshen and Stone in their 1984 CART framework, that partitions the data with hierarchical if-then rules. Each split sends observations down one branch or another until a prediction is read off the leaf.	Logistic regression is a statistical method for modeling the probability of a binary outcome (disease present/absent, success/failure) as a function of continuous and categorical predictors. Developed by David Roxbee Cox (1958), it solves the problem of predicting categorical outcomes by applying a logistic transformation to constrain predictions to the [0,1] probability interval, enabling accurate risk stratification, diagnostic prediction, and causal inference in epidemiology, medicine, and social science.