ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Propensity Score Matching em Pesquisa Educacional×Ponderação por Escore de Propensão (PEP / IPW)×
ÁreaInferência causalInferência causal
FamíliaRegression modelRegression model
Ano de origem1983 (foundational); education adoption widespread from late 1990s1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
Autor originalRosenbaum & Rubin (1983); widely adopted in education research via Shadish, Cook & Campbell (2002)Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
TipoQuasi-experimental / matching-based causal inferenceCausal inference / reweighting
Fonte seminalRosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
Outros nomesPSM in education, educational PSM, PSM for program evaluation in schools, propensity matching educationPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Relacionados56
ResumoPropensity Score Matching (PSM) in education research is a quasi-experimental technique that creates comparable treatment and control groups from observational student, teacher, or school data. By balancing groups on observed background characteristics, it enables credible causal estimates of educational interventions — such as tutoring programs, school choice policies, or teacher professional development — when random assignment is infeasible.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Propensity Score Matching in Education Research · Propensity Score Weighting. Recuperado em 2026-06-20 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare