Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Estudo de Lição Participativo× | Pesquisa-Ação Educacional× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Métodos de campo | Métodos de campo |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 2000s–2010s (core lesson study from late 19th-century Japan) | 1940s (Lewin); educational context developed 1970s–1980s |
| Autor original≠ | Broader participatory framing developed by Pete Dudley and collaborators, building on Japanese jugyokenkyu tradition | Kurt Lewin (action research foundations); Lawrence Stenhouse and John Elliott (educational adaptation) |
| Tipo≠ | Collaborative practitioner inquiry | Participatory qualitative research design |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Dudley, P. (Ed.). (2014). Lesson Study: Professional Learning for Our Time. Routledge. ISBN: 978-0415820714 | Elliott, J. (1991). Action Research for Educational Change. Open University Press. ISBN: 978-0335096190 |
| Outros nomes | PLS, collaborative lesson study, inclusive lesson study, community lesson study | EAR, practitioner research, teacher action research, classroom action research |
| Relacionados≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Resumo≠ | Participatory Lesson Study is an iterative, team-based professional development approach in which teachers — and often students, parents, or community members — jointly plan, observe, and critically reflect on live lessons to improve learning for a specific group of students. It extends the Japanese lesson study tradition by explicitly broadening participation beyond the teaching team to include diverse stakeholders, foregrounding equity, inclusion, and community perspectives in the inquiry cycle. | Educational action research is a cyclical, practitioner-led inquiry method in which educators systematically investigate a problem or opportunity in their own classroom or school, implement a change, observe its effects, and reflect on findings to guide the next cycle. Rooted in Kurt Lewin's action research framework and developed for educational contexts by Lawrence Stenhouse and John Elliott, it bridges the gap between educational theory and classroom practice by making teachers agents of rigorous inquiry. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|