Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Econometria de Redes (Efeitos de Pares)× | Análise de Centralidade× | Método de Variáveis Instrumentais (VI) para Inferência Causal× | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Área≠ | Econometria | Análise de redes | Economia da saúde |
| Família≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 2009 | 1979 | 1990s (modern applications) |
| Autor original≠ | Yann Bramoullé, Habiba Djebbari & Bernard Fortin | Linton C. Freeman | Angrist & Pischke (applied econometrics); rooted in econometric theory |
| Tipo≠ | Linear-in-means peer effects regression | Descriptive / exploratory network measure family | Method |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Bramoullé, Y., Djebbari, H., & Fortin, B. (2009). Identification of peer effects through social networks. Journal of Econometrics, 150(1), 41–55. DOI ↗ | Freeman, L.C. (1979). Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215-239. DOI ↗ | Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press. link ↗ |
| Outros nomes | Social Interactions Model, Peer Effects Model, Social Network Regression, Ağ Ekonometrisi | Merkeziyet Analizi (Degree, Betweenness, Eigenvector), node centrality, centrality measures, graph centrality | IV, two-stage least squares, TSLS, causal estimation |
| Relacionados≠ | 3 | 5 | 3 |
| Resumo≠ | Network econometrics estimates how individuals' outcomes are causally shaped by the behaviour and characteristics of their social-network neighbours. Formalised by Bramoullé, Djebbari, and Fortin (2009), the framework embeds a row-normalised adjacency matrix into a linear regression, separating endogenous peer effects (imitation of outcomes), exogenous contextual effects (influence of neighbours' attributes), and correlated effects (shared environment), while using network topology to construct valid instruments. | Centrality analysis is a family of network-analytic measures, formalized by Freeman (1979), that quantifies the structural importance of individual nodes within a graph. Each centrality index captures a distinct mechanism of influence: degree centrality reflects direct connectivity, betweenness centrality identifies nodes that broker information flow, closeness centrality captures proximity to all others, and eigenvector centrality (along with PageRank) rewards connection to highly connected neighbors. | Instrumental variables (IV) is an econometric method to estimate causal effects when treatment or exposure is not randomly assigned and confounding is severe or unmeasured. IV relies on a third variable (instrument) that influences treatment but does not directly affect the outcome, allowing researchers to isolate the causal effect from the noise of confounding. Developed extensively in econometrics (Angrist & Pischke, 1990s–2000s), IV methods are increasingly used in health economics and health services research to leverage natural experiments and policy changes. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|
|