Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Registro de Ensaios Clínicos× | Processo de Submissão a Comitê de Ética× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Ética em pesquisa | Ética em pesquisa |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 2005 | 1991 |
| Autor original≠ | World Health Organization; International Committee of Medical Journal Editors | U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; International research oversight organizations |
| Tipo≠ | Requirement | Guideline |
| Fonte seminal≠ | World Health Organization. (2005). Ensuring that Studies Are Prospectively Registered. International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Statement. link ↗ | U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2018). Protection of Human Subjects. Code of Federal Regulations Title 45, Part 46, Section 46.109. link ↗ |
| Outros nomes≠ | trial registration, prospective registration, ClinicalTrials.gov, trial registry | IRB application, REC application, ethics approval, protocol submission |
| Relacionados | 5 | 5 |
| Resumo≠ | Clinical trial registration is the prospective documentation of a trial's key information (hypothesis, design, population, outcomes) in a public registry before enrollment begins or results are known. In 2005, the World Health Organization established the requirement that all clinical trials be registered in an internationally recognized registry before participant enrollment. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) made registration a condition for publication in major medical journals in 2005, updated in 2015. Primary registries include ClinicalTrials.gov (U.S.), ISRCTN (UK), EudraCT (EU), and others operating under WHO oversight. Registration serves to prevent selective outcome reporting, reduce publication bias, and enhance research transparency. | Submitting a research protocol to an ethics committee (IRB, REC, or equivalent) is a mandatory procedural gateway in human subjects research. The application process requires researchers to document their study design, justify scientific rationale, disclose risks and benefits, provide participant protections (informed consent forms), and address ethical considerations. The submission includes a completed ethics application form, protocol document, consent forms, researcher CVs, and evidence of institutional support. This standardized process enables ethics committees to conduct rigorous, timely, and consistent review before research commences. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|