ScholarGate
Assistent
MCDMRetrospective / accountability voting theory

Economic Voting Analysis

Economic voting analysis is the formal study of how voters reward or punish incumbents according to economic performance. In the reward-punishment (retrospective) model pioneered by Gerald Kramer in 1971, support for the governing party is a function of recent economic outcomes — growth, unemployment, and inflation — so that good times re-elect incumbents and bad times turn them out. Michael Lewis-Beck and Mary Stegmaier's 2000 review consolidated the field, establishing that economic voting is predominantly sociotropic (based on the national economy rather than personal finances) and that its strength depends on the clarity of responsibility: how easily voters can attribute outcomes to the incumbent.

Åpne i MethodMindSnartBruk, sammenlign, få veiledning
Verktøy og ressurser
Last ned lysbilder
Lær og utforsk
VideoSnart

Les hele metoden

Kun for medlemmer

Logg inn med en gratis konto for å lese denne delen.

Logg inn

Metodekart

Nabolaget av beslektede metoder — velg en node for å utforske.

Kilder

  1. Kramer, G. H. (1971). Short-Term Fluctuations in U.S. Voting Behavior, 1896-1964. American Political Science Review, 65(1), 131-143. DOI: 10.2307/1955049
  2. Lewis-Beck, M. S., & Stegmaier, M. (2000). Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 183-219. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.183

Slik siterer du denne siden

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Economic Voting Model (Retrospective and Reward-Punishment). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/no/political-economy/economic-voting-analysis

Hvilken metode?

Sett denne metoden ved siden av sin nærmeste slektning og les dem side om side — biblioteket legger bøkene på bordet; valget er ditt.

Sammenlign side om side

Referert av

ScholarGateEconomic Voting Analysis (Economic Voting Model (Retrospective and Reward-Punishment)). Hentet 2026-06-25 fra https://scholargate.app/no/political-economy/economic-voting-analysis · Datasett: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026