Sammenlign metoder
Gjennomgå de valgte metodene side om side; rader som avviker, er uthevet.
| Nøyaktighet× | Forvirringsmatrise× | F1-skår× | Presisjon× | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fagfelt | Modellevaluering | Modellevaluering | Modellevaluering | Modellevaluering |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM | MCDM | MCDM |
| Opprinnelsesår≠ | 20th century | 20th century | 1979 | 20th century |
| Opphavsperson≠ | Historical statistical foundations | Statistical foundations | C. J. van Rijsbergen | Historical statistical foundations |
| Type≠ | Evaluation metric | Evaluation visualization | Evaluation metric | Evaluation metric |
| Opprinnelig kilde≠ | Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗ | Everitt, B. S., & Hothorn, T. (2005). A Handbook of Statistical Analyses Using R. Chapman and Hall/CRC. link ↗ | van Rijsbergen, C. J. (1979). Information Retrieval (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. link ↗ | Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | Overall Accuracy, Correct Classification Rate | Error Matrix, Contingency Table | F-measure, Harmonic Mean | Positive Predictive Value, PPV |
| Relaterte | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Sammendrag≠ | Accuracy is the proportion of correct predictions among the total number of predictions made by a classification model. It is the most intuitive performance metric and measures how often the classifier makes correct predictions overall, regardless of class. | The confusion matrix is a table that displays the counts of true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives. It provides a complete picture of where a classifier makes correct and incorrect predictions, enabling calculation of all other classification metrics. | The F1-score is the harmonic mean of precision and recall, providing a single metric that balances both concerns. It was introduced by van Rijsbergen in information retrieval and has become a standard metric for evaluating classification models where both precision and recall are important. | Precision measures the proportion of positive predictions that were actually correct. It answers the question: 'Of all the cases we predicted as positive, how many were truly positive?' Precision is critical in scenarios where false positives are costly. |
| ScholarGateDatasett ↗ |
|
|
|
|