ScholarGate
Assistent
Process / pipelineBiblical exegesis / literary criticism of scripture

Intertextuality Analysis

Intertextuality analysis studies how one text invokes another, and in biblical studies it focuses on the dense web of allusion and echo by which later scripture reuses earlier scripture. When Paul quotes, paraphrases, or faintly echoes Israel's scriptures, the borrowed words carry their old context into the new, enriching and sometimes reshaping the meaning. Richard B. Hays's 1989 Echoes of Scripture in the Letters of Paul made this study rigorous by proposing a set of criteria for deciding when an apparent echo is real and what it does. Drawing the term intertextuality from literary theory but giving it a controlled, text-critical application, Hays distinguished quotation, allusion, and the faintest echo, and showed how an evoked source text can transform a passage through the figure of metalepsis. The method gives disciplined criteria for a notoriously slippery interpretive judgment.

Openen in MethodMindBinnenkortToepassen, vergelijken, advies krijgen
Tools & bronnen
Dia's downloaden
Leren & verkennen
VideoBinnenkort

Lees de volledige methode

Alleen voor leden

Log in met een gratis account om dit onderdeel te lezen.

Inloggen

Methodenkaart

De omgeving van verwante methoden — selecteer een knooppunt om te verkennen.

Bronnen

  1. Hays, R. B. (1989). Echoes of Scripture in the Letters of Paul. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN: 9780300044713

Deze pagina citeren

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Intertextuality Analysis (Inner-Biblical Allusion and Echo). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/nl/religious-studies/intertextuality-analysis

Welke methode?

Plaats deze methode naast haar naaste verwanten en lees ze naast elkaar — de bibliotheek legt de boeken op tafel; de keuze is aan u.

Naast elkaar vergelijken

Geciteerd door

ScholarGateIntertextuality Analysis (Intertextuality Analysis (Inner-Biblical Allusion and Echo)). Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-24 via https://scholargate.app/nl/religious-studies/intertextuality-analysis · Gegevensset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026