Form Criticism
Form criticism (Formgeschichte) studies the small, originally oral units that make up the biblical text, asking what genre each unit belongs to, what social setting gave rise to it, and how it developed before reaching written form. Hermann Gunkel pioneered the approach for the Hebrew Bible, treating the narratives of Genesis and the Psalms as folk forms shaped by communal use, while Rudolf Bultmann and Martin Dibelius applied it to the Gospels, analyzing the sayings and stories about Jesus as units that circulated and were shaped by the early church before the evangelists wrote. Bultmann's 1921 History of the Synoptic Tradition is the method's most systematic statement. The core conviction is that form and function are linked: a unit's genre points to the recurring life-setting, the Sitz im Leben, in which the community used it.
Lees de volledige methode
Log in met een gratis account om dit onderdeel te lezen.
Methodenkaart
De omgeving van verwante methoden — selecteer een knooppunt om te verkennen.
Bronnen
- Bultmann, R. (1963). The History of the Synoptic Tradition (trans. J. Marsh). New York: Harper & Row. [German original 1921]. ISBN: 9780060611729
- Gunkel, H. (1987). The Legends of Genesis: The Biblical Saga and History (trans. W. H. Carruth). New York: Schocken Books. [German original 1901]. ISBN: 9780805200867
Deze pagina citeren
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Form Criticism (Formgeschichte: Genre Classification and Tradition History). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/nl/religious-studies/form-criticism
Welke methode?
Plaats deze methode naast haar naaste verwanten en lees ze naast elkaar — de bibliotheek legt de boeken op tafel; de keuze is aan u.
- Historical-Critical ExegesisReligious Studies↔ vergelijken
- Intertextuality AnalysisReligious Studies↔ vergelijken
- Redaction CriticismReligious Studies↔ vergelijken
- Source Criticism (Documentary Hypothesis)Religious Studies↔ vergelijken
Geciteerd door
Vergelijkbare methoden
Een fout op deze pagina gezien? Meld het of stel een correctie voor →