Historical-Critical Exegesis
Historical-critical exegesis is the dominant scholarly approach to interpreting the Bible: it reads each text in its original language, genre, and historical setting in order to recover what its author meant and what its first audience would have understood. Rather than reading scripture through later doctrine or present concerns, it asks the historical question first. The method is not one technique but an integrated family that draws on textual, source, form, and redaction criticism, applying them within a grammatico-historical reading. Edgar Krentz's compact 1975 The Historical-Critical Method describes its rise, goals, and procedures, while John Barton's 2007 The Nature of Biblical Criticism offers a philosophical defense, arguing that biblical criticism is at heart a disciplined attention to what the text means in its literary and historical context.
Lees de volledige methode
Log in met een gratis account om dit onderdeel te lezen.
Methodenkaart
De omgeving van verwante methoden — selecteer een knooppunt om te verkennen.
Bronnen
- Krentz, E. (1975). The Historical-Critical Method. Philadelphia: Fortress Press (Guides to Biblical Scholarship). ISBN: 9780800604608
- Barton, J. (2007). The Nature of Biblical Criticism. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press. ISBN: 9780664225872
Deze pagina citeren
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Historical-Critical Exegesis (Grammatico-Historical Interpretation of Scripture). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/nl/religious-studies/historical-critical-exegesis
Welke methode?
Plaats deze methode naast haar naaste verwanten en lees ze naast elkaar — de bibliotheek legt de boeken op tafel; de keuze is aan u.
- Form CriticismReligious Studies↔ vergelijken
- Redaction CriticismReligious Studies↔ vergelijken
- Source Criticism (Documentary Hypothesis)Religious Studies↔ vergelijken
- Stemmatic Textual CriticismReligious Studies↔ vergelijken
Geciteerd door
Vergelijkbare methoden
Een fout op deze pagina gezien? Meld het of stel een correctie voor →