Voice of Customer Analysis
Voice of Customer (VoC) analysis is a structured method for hearing what customers actually need, in their own words, and turning that into a prioritized, organized set of requirements for product development. Abbie Griffin and John Hauser established its modern foundations in their 1993 Marketing Science article, which examined the customer-needs component of Quality Function Deployment and answered practical questions: how many customers to interview, how to extract needs from verbatims, how to structure them, and whether one-on-one interviews or focus groups are more efficient. Their key empirical findings — that needs accumulate toward saturation, that a modest number of interviews uncovers most needs, and that one-on-one interviews are at least as productive per dollar as focus groups — turned VoC from an art into a repeatable research process. The method distills raw customer statements into solution-free need statements, organizes them into a primary-secondary-tertiary hierarchy through customer sorting, and assigns importance weights using survey priorities, an idea closely tied to importance-performance thinking. Those weighted, structured needs then feed Quality Function Deployment, where they are mapped onto engineering attributes to drive design decisions.
Lees de volledige methode
Log in met een gratis account om dit onderdeel te lezen.
Methodenkaart
De omgeving van verwante methoden — selecteer een knooppunt om te verkennen.
Bronnen
- Griffin, A., & Hauser, J. R. (1993). The Voice of the Customer. Marketing Science, 12(1), 1-27. DOI: 10.1287/mksc.12.1.1 ↗
- Martilla, J. A., & James, J. C. (1977). Importance-Performance Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77-79. DOI: 10.1177/002224297704100112 ↗
Deze pagina citeren
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Voice of Customer Analysis (Structured Customer-Needs Elicitation and QFD Linkage). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/nl/marketing-science/voice-of-customer-analysis
Welke methode?
Plaats deze methode naast haar naaste verwanten en lees ze naast elkaar — de bibliotheek legt de boeken op tafel; de keuze is aan u.
- Importance-Performance AnalysisMarketing Science↔ vergelijken
- Kano ModelMens-computerinteractie↔ vergelijken
- Perceptual MappingMarketing Science↔ vergelijken
Geciteerd door
Vergelijkbare methoden
Een fout op deze pagina gezien? Meld het of stel een correctie voor →