ScholarGate
Assistent
Process / pipelinePrevention and identification framework

Response to Intervention

Response to intervention (RTI) is a multi-tiered framework for preventing academic failure and identifying students with learning disabilities by their responsiveness to high-quality instruction. All students are screened and taught with evidence-based core instruction; those who fall behind receive progressively more intensive intervention while their progress is closely monitored. Students who fail to respond even to intensive, well-implemented intervention are flagged as needing further evaluation. RTI reframes disability identification from a static test discrepancy to a dynamic question of who does not respond to good teaching.

Openen in MethodMindBinnenkortToepassen, vergelijken, advies krijgen
Tools & bronnen
Dia's downloaden
Leren & verkennen
VideoBinnenkort

Lees de volledige methode

Alleen voor leden

Log in met een gratis account om dit onderdeel te lezen.

Inloggen

Methodenkaart

De omgeving van verwante methoden — selecteer een knooppunt om te verkennen.

Bronnen

  1. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93–99. DOI: 10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4
  2. Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52(3), 219–232. DOI: 10.1177/001440298505200303

Deze pagina citeren

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Response to Intervention: Tiered Identification and Support. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/nl/education/response-to-intervention-analysis

Welke methode?

Plaats deze methode naast haar naaste verwanten en lees ze naast elkaar — de bibliotheek legt de boeken op tafel; de keuze is aan u.

Naast elkaar vergelijken

Geciteerd door

ScholarGateResponse to Intervention (Response to Intervention: Tiered Identification and Support). Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-24 via https://scholargate.app/nl/education/response-to-intervention-analysis · Gegevensset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026