ScholarGate
Assistent
Process / pipelineTheory-driven evaluation

Theory-Based Impact Evaluation

Theory-based impact evaluation evaluates a programme by first making explicit the theory of change — the causal chain of assumptions and mechanisms through which inputs are expected to produce outcomes and impacts — and then gathering evidence to test whether each link in that chain holds. Rather than treating the programme as a black box and estimating only the net effect, it asks not just whether a programme worked but why, for whom, and under what conditions. Articulated by Carol Weiss and brought into development practice by Howard White and 3ie, it complements, rather than competes with, counterfactual designs.

Openen in MethodMindBinnenkortToepassen, vergelijken, advies krijgen
Tools & bronnen
Dia's downloaden
Leren & verkennen
VideoBinnenkort

Lees de volledige methode

Alleen voor leden

Log in met een gratis account om dit onderdeel te lezen.

Inloggen

Methodenkaart

De omgeving van verwante methoden — selecteer een knooppunt om te verkennen.

Bronnen

  1. White, H. (2009). Theory-Based Impact Evaluation: Principles and Practice. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 1(3), 271–284. DOI: 10.1080/19439340903114628
  2. Weiss, C. H. (1997). Theory-based evaluation: Past, present, and future. New Directions for Evaluation, 1997(76), 41–55. DOI: 10.1002/ev.1086

Deze pagina citeren

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Theory-Based Impact Evaluation (Theory of Change / Contribution Analysis). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/nl/development-studies/theory-based-impact-evaluation

Welke methode?

Plaats deze methode naast haar naaste verwanten en lees ze naast elkaar — de bibliotheek legt de boeken op tafel; de keuze is aan u.

Naast elkaar vergelijken

Geciteerd door

ScholarGateTheory-Based Impact Evaluation (Theory-Based Impact Evaluation (Theory of Change / Contribution Analysis)). Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-24 via https://scholargate.app/nl/development-studies/theory-based-impact-evaluation · Gegevensset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026